Meropenem: continuous or extended infusion?

peer reviewe

Continuous infusion and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with ceftazidime-avibactam: evaluation of efficacy based on therapeutic drug monitoring

peer reviewedBased on recent PK/PD evidence, continuous infusion (CI) of beta-lactam administration is increasingly recommended for serious infections. Since 2016, the combination of ceftazidime and avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is administered per manufacturer prescription as an intermittent infusion of 2,5g every 8 hours thus CI has not yet been evaluated in clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the use of CI of CAZ/AVI in a retrospective case series, from December 2016 to October 2019. All isolates displayed in vitro susceptibility to CAZ/AVI in agreement with EUCAST breakpoint. Patients were initially given CAZ/AVI as CI of 5g q12h. CAZ/AVI dosages were adjusted according to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ceftazidime with a therapeutic goal of 4-5xT> MIC in the plasma and/or at the site of infection. The latter was extrapolated from plasma concentrations and literature data CAZ/AVI was administered as CI in ten of thirty-three infectious episodes in twenty-seven patients treated with CAZ/ AVI in our hospital. These infections were mainly caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (54,5%). Bacteremia occurred in 30% of cases and septic shock was only present in one patient. CAZ/AVI was used as monotherapy in 60% of cases. Clinical cure or improvement was achieved in 70 % of cases and microbiological cure was achieved in 6/7 (86%) evaluable cases (Table 1). Thirty days after the CAZ/AVI treatment onset, two patients (20%) had died, with death possibly related to uncontrolled infection in one case. Three patients were discharged home with an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Based on repeated TDM (3,5 samples/patient), therapeutic goals were achieved in 100% of cases in plasma and 88% of cases at the site of infection (8/10 evaluable), CAZ/AVI looked stable for 12-hour infusions and no drug-related adverse events were noted. Although the sample size was limited, our case series shows promising clinical results for CI of CAZ/AVI, including for OPAT. Based on repeated TDM, therapeutic goals were achieved in 100% of cases in plasma. CAZ/AVI looked stable for 12-hour infusions and no drug-related adverse events were noted

Pharmacokinetics of Extended vs Intermittent Intravenous Infusion of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration

peer reviewe

Machine learning identification of specific changes in myeloid cell phenotype during bloodstream infections

The early identification of bacteremia is critical for ensuring appropriate treatment of nosocomial infections in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The aim of this study was to use flow cytometric data of myeloid cells as a biomarker of bloodstream infection (BSI). An eight-color antibody panel was used to identify seven monocyte and two dendritic cell subsets. In the learning cohort, immunophenotyping was applied to (1) control subjects, (2) postoperative heart surgery patients, as a model of noninfectious inflammatory responses, and (3) blood culture-positive patients. Of the complex changes in the myeloid cell phenotype, a decrease in myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cell numbers, increase in CD14(+)CD16(+) inflammatory monocyte numbers, and upregulation of neutrophils CD64 and CD123 expression were prominent in BSI patients. An extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm called the “infection detection and ranging score” (iDAR), ranging from 0 to 100, was developed to identify infection-specific changes in 101 phenotypic variables related to neutrophils, monocytes and dendritic cells. The tenfold cross-validation achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.988 (95% CI 0.985–1) for the detection of bacteremic patients. In an out-of-sample, in-house validation, iDAR achieved an AUROC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.71–0.98) in differentiating localized from bloodstream infection and 0.95 (95% CI 0.89–1) in discriminating infected from noninfected ICU patients. In conclusion, a machine learning approach was used to translate the changes in myeloid cell phenotype in response to infection into a score that could identify bacteremia with high specificity in ICU patients

Modelled target attainment after temocillin treatment in severe pneumonia: systemic and epithelial lining fluid pharmacokinetics of continuous versus intermittent infusions.

Objectives: To describe the population pharmacokinetics of temocillin administered via continuous versus intermittent infusion in critically ill patients with pneumonia. Secondary objectives included characterization of epithelial lining fluid (ELF)/plasma penetration ratios and determination of the probability of target attainment (PTA) for a range of MICs. Methods: Thirty-two mechanically ventilated patients who were treated for pneumonia with 6g of temocillin daily for in vitro sensitive pathogens were assigned either to the II (2g every 8h over 0.5h) or to the CI (6g over 24h after a loading dose of 2g) group. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using unbound plasma and total ELF concentrations of temocillin and related Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess PTAs. Results: The AUC(0-24) ELF/plasma penetration ratio was 0.73, at steady-state, for both modes of infusion and whatever the level of creatinine clearance. Monte Carlo simulations showed for the minimal pharmacodynamic (PD) targets of 50% T> 1X MIC (II group) and 100% T > 1X MIC (CI group), PK/PD breakpoints of 4 mg/L in plasma and 2 mg/L in ELF and 4mg/L in plasma and ELF, respectively. The breakpoint was 8 mg/L in ELF for both modes of infusion in patients with CL(CR)<60mL/min. Conclusion: While CI provides better PKPD indexes, the latter remain below available recommendations for systemic infections, except in case of moderate renal impairment, thereby warranting future clinical studies in order to determine the efficacy of temocillin in severe pneumonia

Annals of Intensive Care

peer reviewe

Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy in Severe COVID-19: Preliminary Results of a Phase I/II Clinical Trial

peer reviewedBackground: Treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with COronaVIrus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) currently relies on dexamethasone and supportive mechanical ventilation, and remains associated with high mortality. Given their ability to limit inflammation, induce immune cells into a regulatory phenotype and stimulate tissue repair, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) represent a promising therapy for severe and critical COVID-19 disease, which is associated with an uncontrolled immune-mediated inflammatory response. Methods: In this phase I-II trial, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3 intravenous infusions of bone marrow (BM)-derived MSCs at 3-day intervals in patients with severe COVID-19. All patients also received dexamethasone and standard supportive therapy. Between June 2020 and September 2021, 8 intensive care unit patients requiring supplemental oxygen (high-flow nasal oxygen in 7 patients, invasive mechanical ventilation in 1 patient) were treated with BM-MSCs. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of these MSC-treated patients with those of 24 matched control patients. Groups were compared by paired statistical tests. Results: MSC infusions were well tolerated, and no adverse effect related to MSC infusions were reported (one patient had an ischemic stroke related to aortic endocarditis). Overall, 3 patients required invasive mechanical ventilation, including one who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, but all patients ultimately had a favorable outcome. Survival was significantly higher in the MSC group, both at 28 and 60 days (100% vs 79.2%, p = 0.025 and 100% vs 70.8%, p = 0.0082, respectively), while no significant difference was observed in the need for mechanical ventilation nor in the number of invasive ventilation-free days, high flow nasal oxygenation-free days, oxygen support-free days and ICU-free days. MSC-treated patients also had a significantly lower day-7 D-dimer value compared to control patients (median 821.0 µg/L [IQR 362.0-1305.0] vs 3553 µg/L [IQR 1155.0-6433.5], p = 0.0085). Conclusions: BM-MSC therapy is safe and shows very promising efficacy in severe COVID-19, with a higher survival in our MSC cohort compared to matched control patients. These observations need to be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial designed to demonstrate the efficacy of BM-MSCs in COVID-19 ARDS. Clinical Trial Registration (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), identifier NCT0444545

The first wave of COVID-19 in Intensive care

In December 2019, in Wuhan, a new human infectious pathology was born, COVID-19, consisting above all in pneumoniae, induced by the coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 because of the respiratory distress it caused (SARS for severe acute respiratory syndrome, and CoV for Coronavirus). A real health and planetary crisis has appeared, much more substantial than that linked to SARS-CoV-1 in 2002-2004 and to MERS-CoV (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus) in 2012. In addition to respiratory damage that can be dramatic, this pathology is complicated by the frequency of cardiovascular, renal and coagulation diseases. Health care systems have had to adapt urgently, in the absence of hindsight from the patho- logy, and without effective therapeutic weapons. Through this review of the literature, we detail our local practices for the overall management of patients hospitalized in Intensive care